Report sheds light on appalling working conditions in spinning mills

Just when it seemed that the garment industry was on its way to becoming
more responsible – with efforts by individual brands and retailers and the
Bangladesh Accord and Alliance making progress – another jack-in-the-box
jumps out of it, this time in the form of the very fabric clothes are made
of. A new report looks at the situation at South Indian spinning mills and
finds appalling conditions.

Titled “Flawed Fabrics – The abuse of girls and women workers in the
South Indian textile industry”, the report scrutinized the conditions at
five Tamil Nadu spinning mills, namely Best Cotton Mills, Jeyavishnu
Spintex, Premier Mills, Sulochana Cotton Spinning Mills and Super Spinning
Mills. Tamil Nadu is a major hub in the global textile and knitwear
industry, producing cotton yarn and fabrics for further processing in the
Indian and international garment industry, particular in Bangladesh where
it is used to make ready-made garments for clients like C&A, Mothercare,
HanesBrands, Sainsbury’s and Primark. In fact, two of the mills are
supplying to garment factories in Bangladesh that fall under the Bangladesh
Accord on Fire and Building Safety.

Spinning mills in Tamil Nadu supply to RMG units in Bangladesh

Tamil Nadu is home to some 1,600 mills, with a workforce of more than
400,000 people, of which 60 percent are girls and young women under 18. The
joint report by the Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations
(SOMO) and the India Committee of the Netherlands (ICN) based its research
on in-depth interviews with 151 of these workers, combined with an analysis
of corporate information and export data regarding the companies involved.

The women and girls who work in the spinning mills of Tamil Nadu, some
as young as 15, are mostly recruited from marginalised Dalit communities in
impoverished rural areas. They have been lured from their home with
attractive promises of decent jobs and good pay but in reality, they have
to work under appalling conditions that amount to modern day slavery and
the worst forms of child labour.

They are forced to work long hours for low wages, there are no contracts
or payslips, no paid leave, no paid sick leave. They live in very basic
company-run hostels and are hardly ever allowed to leave the company
compound; one young worker compared it to a “semi-prison”. Needless to say,
there is nowhere to complain and there are no trade unions to speak up for
these workers.

Women’s hostels are ‘semi-prisons’

And after a long day of work, there is little to look forward to – it is
mandatory for the young women who come from out of town to stay in the
hostels located on the factory grounds. The facilities are very basic and
one room often houses 35 women; one toilet and bathroom is shared by 35-40
workers. Cell phones are not allowed, neither is leaving the hostel alone,
making contact to the outside world and after-work activities almost
impossible. Not surprisingly, the state of the mental health of these women
is poor and suicides do occur.

Click Here: NRL Telstra Premiership

For most of us – if put in the shoes of the girls working in the
spinning mills – the working hours alone would be enough to break us. They
range from a minimum of 54 and 56 working hours per week (at Jeyavishnu
Sulochana, respectively) to 68 at Best and Super and up to 72 hours at
Premier. That means slogging for at least eight hours to more than ten
hours a day with only a short break – 10 whole minutes at Premier (for tea
and toilet as specified) and 30-40 minutes at the other mills. Thus,
workers drink very little throughout the day to avoid having to go to the
toilet, causing dehydration and serious bladder, kidney and liver
implications in the long run.

Of the retailers mentioned, only Primark already issued an official
statement on its website, saying that the company “*shares the concern of
SOMO and ICN over working and employment conditions in the Southern Indian
cotton mill industry”. However, Primark denies sourcing from Sulochana
mills, blaming false claims made on the Sulochana website. The textile
discounter admits to using Jeyavishnu Spinntex though, saying that “Primark
accepts that this mill has issues that need rectification and will continue
to work with them to resolve them.“

Primark refers to previous inspections

The company also referred to inspections by specialist auditors and a
program put into place at Jevavishnu in 2012 to improve women’s health,
saying that it is “already bringing benefits”. In addition, Primark states
it would put its “Fair Hiring, Fair Labour programme in place in the mill
as soon as possible, to continue the process of improving working and
employment conditions”.

Though the report indicates to have received responses from C&A, H&M,
Mothercare, Sainsbury’s, Standard Chartered Bank and Raiffeisen Bank (Czech
Republic) as well, none of the retailers had issued an official statement
at the time of going to press.It recommends for retailers, brands and
manufacturers to “identify, prevent and mitigate risks and negative impacts
in their supply chain, in accordance with the United Nations Guiding
Principles on Business and Human Rights” and to insist on transparency in
the whole supply chain.